“Plaintiff has a right under the 8th Amendment to be free from cruel and unusual punishment and [(also)] to be held on non-excessive bail” (Doc. 72, Priority Claims #2 and #3, pg. 28, ln 3-6, R. at 141.)" Opening Brief, PP 39
​
"Plaintiff-Appellant was beaten (reported by the custodian as Battery under Ca § PC 243(a)) and could have reasonably died from such beating (see Doc. 72, pg. 9, ¶ 11(b), R. at 122.), and SDC Sheriff Report #16153663, including withheld CTT Video and Photographic evidence preserved), which Plaintiff-Appellant holds as a form of cruel and unusual punishment)" Opening Brief, PP 39
Opening Brief
Plaintiff-Appellant's Opening Brief: A priori, 4th and 8th Amendment Violations by the SDDA and Communist DDA Leonard Nyugen Trinh
Answering Brief
Defendant-Appellee's Reply Brief: frivolous non-sense by an agent of anti-federalism, Mr. Ronald C. Lenert
Reply Brief
Plaintiff-Appellant's Reply Brief: imagine a non-attorney, moving in good faith, with logical argument
Supp. Brief
Plaintiff-Appellant's Supplemental Brief: additional case law authority
Excerpts of Record
U.S. Supreme Court Petition
U.S. Supreme Court Petition
PORTAL to SDDA / CA Prosecution of Davis
The San Diego County Judicial System, including the SD Sheriff Dept., is purposefully designed to maximum revenue for the department, holding a monopoly, and unlawfully incarcerating individuals while clearly (i.e. prima facie) violating the U.S. Constitution.
​
Normally people don't care - they're just inmates, criminals, right?
​
Not so, approximately 40% of all Americans could be released from custody with no increase in crime according to NYU Law's non-partisan Brennan Institute for Justice (Dec. 2016)
​
UNITED STATE OF MASS INCARCERATION