"Further, in the Lewis Opinion, “Justice Souter suggests that he would waive [the] actual-injury requirement in cases “involving substantial, systemic deprivation of access to court” – that is, in case involving” ‘a direct, substantial and continuous … limit on legal materials,’” “total denial of access to a [law] library,” or ‘[a]n absolute deprivation of access to all legal materials,’” post, at 401, and 400, n. 2” (Id. at 353)." - Opening Brief, PP 51
Opening Brief
Plaintiff-Appellant's Opening Brief: Denied "Bounds" Access to the Courts in violation of the Petition Clause of the 1st Amendment
Answering Brief
Defendant-Appellee's Reply Brief: frivolous non-sense by an agent of anti-federalism, Mr. Ronald C. Lenert
Reply Brief
Plaintiff-Appellant's Reply Brief: imagine a non-attorney, moving in good faith, with logical argument
Supp. Brief
Plaintiff-Appellant's Supplemental Brief: additional case law authority
Excerpts of Record
Lower Court Record, USDC SD Cal, 18-866-WQH-JLB
Class Certification
FRCP 23 Class Status
​
Questions posed to Supreme Court
Pending drafting of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to SCOTUS
Motion to Stay Mandate
Motion to SCOTUS to Stay Circuit Court Mandate pending drafting of the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
The San Diego County Judicial System, including the SD Sheriff Dept., is purposefully designed to maximum revenue for the department, holding a monopoly, and unlawfully incarcerating individuals while clearly (i.e. prima facie) violating the U.S. Constitution.
​
Normally people don't care - they're just inmates, criminals, right?
​
Not so, approximately 40% of all Americans could be released from custody with no increase in crime according to NYU Law's non-partisan Brennan Institute for Justice (Dec. 2016)
​
UNITED STATE OF MASS INCARCERATION